ANNEX PUBLISHERS

Journal of Paediatrics and Neonatal Disorders

ISSN: 2456-5482

Open Access
Research Article
Max Screen

The Impact of Exploring Chromosome Philadelphia like on the Prognosis of Children and Teenager ALL

Received Date: August 21, 2023 Accepted Date: September 21, 2023 Published Date: September 25, 2023

Copyright: © 2023 Chaimae El Mahdaoui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Related article at Pubmed, Google Scholar

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is considered as the most common pediatric malignancy with 80% of frequency in children between 1 and 10 years old. With the evolution of science, improved diagnosis and adapted treatment, all survival rates increased to a possibility of 80%.

Philadelphia chromosome like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-Like ALL) is a recent genetic discovery characterized by a gene expression profile and high frequency of IKZF1 gene alteration similar to that of BCR-ABL1 positive ALL with a poor outcome. We can identify it in 10% to 15% in children, 20% in adolescents (between 16 - 20 years old) and young adults. It has been reported that ALL Ph like is known with a high frequency in relapse. Yet, adapted treatment with ITK can improve prognosis of patients with this abnormality.

The standard diagnostic B-All panel includes testing for abnormalities using cytogenetic techniques such as karyotype and FISH completed by molecular techniques if needed to explore cryptic abnormalities.

Before testing the Philadelphia like B-ALL, some abnormalities need to be excluded such as hyperdiploidy, BCR- ABL1, ETV6-RUNX1, MLL.

6 subtypes of ALL Ph like were identified so far

Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; cytogenetic; Ph-Like; B-ALL

Introduction

Novel subtypes were identified in the past decade by advanced comprehensive genomic profiling studies. This allowed the identification of new treatment approaches, targeted chemotherapy and allowed the understanding of treatment failure in some ALL cases [1].

The Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, made a major discovery in 2009 of a new subgroup of patients. Using Microarray gene expression analysis, a molecular signature similar to ALL Ph Positive showed in a group of 107 patients that 15% to 20% are expressing the same profile but lacks the BCR-ABL1 gene fusion translocation [2] and characterized by additional kinase-activating alterations.

The hallmark of ALL are chromosomal alterations and include aneuploidy (hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy) and recurring chromosomal translocations such as t(12;21) (ETV6-RUNX1), t(1;19) (TCF3-PBX1), t(9;22) (BCR-ABL1) and rearrangement of MLL [3]. Research has shown that several subgroups of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia ( ALL) have unfavorable prognosis. For example, T-lineage ALL (about 15% of all cases) and the precursor B-lineage subtypes with chromosomal translocations creating MLL-rearrangements or the BCR–ABL1 gene fusion, each found in less than 5% of cases [4]. On the other hand, there are favorable prognosis abnormalities in childhood ALL such as TEL-AML1 (ETV6-RUNX1) that is found in 20-25% of B-ALL patients, hyperdiploidy that is identified with >50 chromosomes and that is found in 25% of B-ALL cases and TCF3 (E2A)-rearranged ALL often E2A–PBX1-positive that is found in about 5% of cases. Unfortunately, about 25% of patients have an unclassified genetic profile (B-other) [5]. These discoveries allow treatment improvements to increase survival rate in ALL patients. Relapses are common in these patients, indicating the need for new biological exploration and treatment options for ALL [6].

The discovery of ALL ph like positives allowed the identification of a poor outcome abnormality and the prospect of Ph-like ALL biology provides an opportunity for adapted therapy.

Emerging targeted therapies hold great promise for advancing the treatment landscape of Philadelphia-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph-Like ALL). Ongoing research and clinical trials are exploring innovative approaches to specifically target the underlying genetic alterations in this subgroup. One notable development is the investigation of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with improved selectivity and potency against fusion kinases present in Ph-Like ALL [3].

Additionally, immune-based therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), are being evaluated for their potential to harness the immune system in targeting leukemic cells [7]. Furthermore, agents targeting key signaling pathways implicated in Ph-Like ALL, such as the JAK-STAT pathway, are showing promise in preclinical studies [8].These emerging therapies represent a significant stride towards more effective and targeted treatment options for patients.

In addition to medical treatment, it is crucial for patients and families affected by Philadelphia-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph-Like ALL) to have access to a network of support and resources. Reputable organizations and support groups play a pivotal role in providing valuable information, emotional support, and practical assistance. The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) and the American Cancer Society (ACS) are prominent organizations that offer a wide range of resources tailored to individuals facing ALL, including those with Ph-Like ALL. These organizations provide comprehensive educational materials, access to expert advice, and opportunities for patients and families to connect with others who share similar experiences [9,10].

Furthermore, local cancer centers and hospitals often have dedicated support teams and social workers who can help navigate available resources [11]. Engaging with such groups and organizations has been shown to significantly improve the well-being and overall quality of life for those affected by Ph-Like ALL [12].

Philadelphia like ALL, a New Biological Discovery

The BCR-ABL Like B-lymphoblastic leukemia ( BCR-ABL1 like B-ALL) also known as Philadelphia-like (Ph-like) ALL, is characterized by rearrangements, sequence mutations and copy number alterations that activate tyrosine kinase or cytokine receptor signaling and are potentially amenable to therapeutic targeting with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The pattern of gene expression is similar to that of B-ALL with the BCR-ABL1 translocation but lacks the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein and is characterized with a high rate of relapse and poor outcome [13].

This new entity gene expression profile is known by the activation of the ABL class or JAK/STAT signaling pathways associated by kinase-activating gene rearrangements.

Many genes are involved in this process including ABL1,ABL2, CRLF2, JAK2, EPOR, NTRK3, CSF1R and PDGFRβ or by activating gene mutations involving genes including JAK1/2/3, FLT3, IL7R, and SH2B3 [14].

Ras pathway activating mutations are also common, as are mutations to the IKZF1 (IKAROS) gene [14].

BCR-ABL1 Like B-ALL has been added to the World Health Organization update in 2016 as a provisional entity [15].

Patients with Ph-like ALL are generally presented at diagnosis with an initial leukocyte count superior to 100 000/uL. Compared with patients with non Ph like ALL, they often display an elevated minimal residual disease at the end of induction therapy [13]. One of the common cases that justifies induction failures in patients with Ph-like ALL is associated with EBF1-PDGFRB gene fusion [16]

Some of the tyrosine kinase genes activation process is illustrated in Figure 1 [17]

Epidemiology and Prevalence

Epidemiologic evaluation constitutes a powerful screen for assessment of patients with high likelihood for the BCR-ABL1-like gene expression phenotype.

The frequency of BCR-ABL1 Like gene expression profile is 15-20% in ALL patients according to different cohorts. It is classified in the high risk group of B-ALL with high-risk features in children as well as new diagnosis B-ALL in adolescents and adults and requires intensive and specific therapy [18- 19].

An interesting study showed that down syndrome patients have high rates of CRLF2 translocations, often associated with activating JAK mutations [20].

Studies have exposed that young adults patients with Ph-like ALL have the worst prognosis compared with children and adolescents (Figure 2).

Ph Like ALL: A Mix Of Genomic Alterations
CRLF2 Rearrangement

CRLF2 rearrangement is a frequent genetic alteration observed in children and young adults with Ph-like ALL. The CRLF2 gene, located on chromosome Xp22.33, encodes the cytokine receptor-like factor 2. Dysregulation of CRLF2 expression and signaling due to rearrangements contributes to leukemogenesis and altered disease biology in Ph-like ALL. The most common CRLF2 rearrangement identified in ALL involves the translocation of the CRLF2 gene with the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGH@), resulting in the formation of the CRLF2-IGH fusion gene. This fusion leads to overexpression of CRLF2 and constitutive activation of downstream signaling pathways, including JAK-STAT signaling [20-23].

The CRLF2-IGH fusion has been associated with a higher risk of relapse and poor prognosis in pediatric B-cell precursor ALL [23].

ABL-Class Gene Rearrangement

ABL-class gene rearrangements are frequently observed in children with Ph-like ALL. These rearrangements involve fusion of the ABL-class genes (such as ABL1, ABL2, and CSF1R) with various partner genes, resulting in the formation of chimeric fusion proteins. ABL-class rearrangements activate tyrosine kinase signaling pathways, including the ABL and JAK-STAT pathways, and contribute to leukemogenesis [24]. The identification of specific ABL-class rearrangements, such as ABL1 fusions with diverse partner genes, highlights the molecular heterogeneity within Ph-like ALL and may have implications for disease prognosis and targeted therapy approaches [24].

JAK2 Rearrangement

In young adults with Ph-like ALL, there is a striking increase in the frequency of JAK2 rearrangements. JAK2 rearrangements involve fusion of the JAK2 gene with various partner genes, leading to constitutive activation of JAK-STAT signaling pathway. This aberrant signaling contributes to leukemogenesis and altered disease biology in Ph-like ALL [25]. The identification of JAK2 rearrangements in young adults has implications for risk stratification and targeted therapy approaches, as JAK inhibitors have shown promise in preclinical studies targeting JAK-STAT signaling in Ph-like ALL [26].

EPOR Rearrangement

EPOR rearrangements are another subgroup of genetic alterations observed in Ph-like ALL. These rearrangements involve fusion of the EPOR gene with partner genes, resulting in dysregulated EPOR signaling. EPOR rearrangements contribute to leukemogenesis and have implications for disease biology in Ph-like ALL. The specific partner genes involved in EPOR rearrangements and their functional consequences are areas of ongoing research [27].

It is important to note that the understanding of rearrangements and mutations in Ph-like ALL is continuously evolving, and ongoing research is aimed at uncovering additional genetic alterations and their functional implications. These discoveries hold promise for developing targeted therapies and improving treatment outcomes for children and young adults with Ph-like ALL.

Ph Like Detection Techniques
Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH)

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) is a widely used technique for detecting chromosomal rearrangements in ALL, including Ph-like ALL, in children and young adults. FISH utilizes fluorescently labeled DNA probes that target specific genomic regions of interest. It allows for the visualization of fusion events involving genes such as CRLF2 and other relevant fusion partners. FISH provides valuable information about the presence and frequency of specific rearrangements in leukemic cells [28].

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (Rt-Pcr)

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is a molecular technique commonly employed to detect fusion transcripts resulting from chromosomal rearrangements in ALL Ph-like cases. RT-PCR involves the conversion of RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA) using reverse transcriptase enzyme, followed by amplification of the target fusion transcript. It enables the sensitive and specific identification of fusion genes, such as CRLF2-IGH, which is prevalent in Ph-like ALL. RT-PCR aids in the diagnosis and risk stratification of pediatric and young adult ALL patients [29].

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies have revolutionized the detection of genetic alterations in ALL Ph-like cases in children and young adults. NGS allows for the comprehensive analysis of the genomic landscape, including gene fusions, point mutations, and structural variations. Whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, or targeted sequencing approaches can identify specific genetic alterations associated with Ph-like ALL. NGS provides high-resolution information, aiding in risk stratification, treatment decision-making, and the development of targeted therapies [30].

Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA)

Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) is a technique used to detect copy number alterations, including deletions and duplications, in target genes relevant to Ph-like ALL. MLPA employs multiplex PCR amplification and hybridization with fluorescently labeled probes to assess the copy number status of specific genes. It helps identify genetic abnormalities, including deletions or duplications in genes such as CRLF2, JAK2, and other relevant loci. MLPA aids in the molecular characterization and risk stratification of pediatric and young adult ALL patients [31].

Cytogenetic Analysis

Conventional cytogenetic analysis, including karyotyping and chromosome banding techniques, remains an important tool for detecting chromosomal abnormalities in pediatric and young adult ALL cases, including Ph-like ALL. Cytogenetic analysis provides an overall view of the chromosomal changes and structural rearrangements in leukemic cells. It complements other targeted detection methods and aids in the diagnosis and risk stratification of ALL patients [32].

These detection techniques play a crucial role in identifying and characterizing the rearrangements and mutations associated with Ph-like ALL. Combining multiple methods allows for a comprehensive assessment of the genetic landscape, aiding in risk stratification, treatment decision-making, and the development of targeted therapies for patients with Ph-like ALL.

Ph Like Recommendations for Targeted Therapy for each Rearrangement and Mutation

Intensive chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are the standard therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Ph like but recently different targeted therapy are being explored to be induced in the treatment protocols.

CRLF2 Rearrangements

JAK Inhibitors: CRLF2 rearrangements often involve dysregulation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib and momelotinib, have shown promising results in preclinical and early-phase clinical trials for patients with CRLF2- rearranged ALL [33].

ABL-Class Gene Rearrangements

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): ABL-class gene rearrangements, including ABL1, ABL2, and PDGFRB fusions, can be targeted with specific TKIs. For example, imatinib is effective against BCR-ABL1 fusion, while dasatinib and nilotinib have shown activity against various ABL-class fusions [34].

JAK2 Rearrangements

JAK Inhibitors: JAK2 rearrangements result in constitutive JAK-STAT pathway activation. JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib and fedratinib, have demonstrated efficacy in targeting JAK2 rearrangements in preclinical studies and clinical trials for Ph-like ALL [21].

EPOR Rearrangements

EPOR Antibodies and Small Molecule Inhibitors: EPOR rearrangements can lead to dysregulated erythropoietin receptor signaling. Monoclonal antibodies against EPOR or small molecule inhibitors targeting downstream signaling pathways are being investigated as potential targeted therapies for Ph-like ALL with EPOR rearrangements [27].

It is important to note that targeted therapies for specific rearrangements and mutations in Ph-like ALL are still under investigation and may be used in the context of clinical trials or off-label. Treatment decisions should be made in consultation with a specialized oncologist and based on the individual patient's characteristics, including the specific genetic alterations present in their leukemia cells.

1 Den Boer ML, van Slegtenhorst M, De Menezes RX, Cheok MH, Buijs-Gladdines JG et al. (2009) A subtype of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with poor treatment outcome: a genome-wide classification study. Lancet Oncol 10: 125-34.
2 Boer JM., Marchante JR, Evans WE, Horstmann M A, Escherich G et al. (2015) BCR-ABL1-like cases in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comparison between DCOG/Erasmus MC and COG/St. Jude signatures. Haematologica 100: e354-7.
3 Pui CH, Roberts KG, Yang JJ, Mullighan CG (2017) Philadelphia Chromosome-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia,17: 464-70.
4 Pieters R, Carroll WL (2010) Biology and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 24: 1-8.
5 Pui CH, Relling MV, Downing JR (2004) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 350: 1535-48.
6 Möricke A, Reiter A, Zimmermann M (2008) Risk-adjusted therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia can decrease treatment burden and improve survival: treatment results of 2169 unselected pediatric and adolescent patients enrolled in the trial ALL-BFM 95 111: 4477-89.
7 Fry TJ, Shah NN, Orentas RJ, Stetler-Stevenson M, Yuan CM (2018) CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy. Nat Med 24: 20-8.
8 Wen W, Liang W, Wu J, Kowolik CM, Buettner R (2014) Targeting JAK1/STAT3 signaling suppresses tumor progression and metastasis in a peritoneal model of human ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 13: 3037-48.
9 Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (2021) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).
10 American Cancer Society (2021) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) in Children
11 Hechler T, Blankenburg M, Friedrichsdorf SJ, Garske D, Hübner B et al. (2017) Parents' perspective on symptoms, quality of life, characteristics of death and end-of-life decisions for children dying from cancer. Klin Padiatr 220: 166-74.
12 Laetsch TW (2018) Larotrectinib for paediatric solid tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions: phase 1 results from a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol 19: 705-14.
13 Roberts KG, Li Y, Payne-Turner D (2014) Targetable kinase-activating lesions in Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 371: 1005-15.
14 Siegele BJ, Nardi V (2018) Laboratory testing in BCR-ABL1-like (Philadelphia-like) B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Am J Hematol 93: 971-7.
15 SHS, EC, NLH (2017) WHO Classification of Tumors of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. Lyon, France: IARC Press.
16 Schwab C, Ryan SL, Chilton L (2016) EBF1-PDGFRB fusion in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCPALL): genetic profile and clinical implications. Blood 127: 2214-8.
17 Chomel JC (2009) Les syndromes myéloprolifératifs. Immunol anal biol spec.
18 van der Veer A, Waanders E, Pieters R (2013) Independent prognostic value of BCRABL1-like signature and IKZF1 deletion,but not high CRLF2 expression, in children with Bcell precursor ALL. Blood 122: 2622-9.
19 Boer JM, Koenders JE, van der Holt B, Exalto C, Sanders MA et al. (2015) Expression profiling of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia identifies a BCR-ABL1-like subgroup characterized by high non-response and relapse rates. Haematologica 100: 261-4.
20 Mullighan CG, Collins-Underwood JR, Phillips LA (2009) Rearrangement of CRLF2 in B-progenitor- and Down syndrome-associated acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet 41: 1243-6.
21 Tran TH, Loh ML (2016) Ph-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program 561-6.
22 Loh ML, Zhang J, Harvey RC (2013) Tyrosine kinome sequencing of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group TARGET Project. Blood 121: 485-8.
23 Yoda A, Yoda Y, Chiaretti S, Bar-Natan M, Mani K et al. (2010) Functional screening identifies CRLF2 in precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 252-7.
24 Roberts KG (2022) Genetic alterations activating kinase and cytokine receptor signaling in high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Cell 22 153-66.
25 Hurtado R, Guirales F, Glaser J, Tirado CA (2015) JAK2 in Ph-like B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Assoc Genet Technol 49: 11-20.
26 Downes CE, McClure BJ, McDougal DP, Heatley SL, Bruning JB et al. (2022). JAK2 Alterations in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Molecular Insights for Superior Precision Medicine Strategies. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology.
27 Russell LJ, De Castro DG, Griffiths M., Telford N, Bernard O Panzer-Grümayer et al. (2008) A novel translocation,t(14;19)(q32;p13), involving IGH@ and the cytokine receptor for erythropoietin. Leukemia 23: 614-7.
28 Potter N, Jones L, Blair H, Strehl S, Harrison C J et al. (2019) Single-cell analysis identifies CRLF2 rearrangements as both early and late events in Down syndrome and non-Down syndrome acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Leukemia 33: 893-904.
29 Yano M, Imamura T, Asai D, Kiyokawa N, Nakabayashi K et al. (2015) Identification of novel kinase fusion transcripts in paediatric B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with IKZF1 deletion. Br J Haematol 171: 813-7.
30 Sherali N, Hamadneh T, Aftab S, Alfonso M., Tsouklidis N (2020) Integration of Next-Generation Sequencing in Diagnosing and Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Cureus 12.
31 ejman M, Włodarczyk M, Zaucha-Prażmo A, Zawitkowska J (2020) Use of microarrays and MLPA for integrating diagnostics and personalizing treatment - Case report of a patient with Ph-like acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Ann Agric Environ Med 27: 713-6
32 odgornik H, Doplihar Kebe A, Klun J, Rebersek K, Sucurovic S (2022) Recognition of Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia as part of routine diagnostic work-up. Int J Lab Hematol 44: 142-9.
33 Harvey RC, Tasian, SK (2020) Clinical diagnostics and treatment strategies for Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood advances 4: 218-28.
34 Tran TH, Hunger SP (2020) ABL-class fusion positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: can targeting ABL cure ALL?. Haematologica 105: 1754-57.

Journal of Paediatrics and Neonatal Disorders

Figures at a glance
image-icon
Figure 1
image-icon
Figure 2
Figure 1: Translocations involved in myeloproliferative syndromes. The tyrosine kinase genes are enriched and can be activated by different partners during chromosomal translocations, or be activated by point mutation (m)
Figure 2: Outcomes of children, adolescents, and young adults with Ph-like ALL. (A) Patients with Ph-like ALL have an inferior outcome compared with patients with non-Ph-like patients treated on AALL0232. (B) Among patients with Ph-like ALL, young adults have the worst prognosis compared with children and adolescents [21]. Adapted from Roberts et al [13] and Loh et al, [22].

Partnered Content Networks

  • Cancer Science
  • Vaccine Studies
  • Gynecology
  • Food Nutrition
  • Nursing Science
  • Public Health
  • The Pharma
  • Infectious Disease
  • Neuro Care
  • Catalysis
  • Neonatal Biology
  • Neonatal Disorders
  • Mutation
  • Nanotechnology
  • Toxicology
  • Dark Biotechnology
  • Pollution Toxicology
  • Cell Biology
  • Bioanalytical Research
  • Renal Disorders
  • The Astrophysics
  • Sleep Physiology
  • Epidemiology
  • Histology