Figure 1: Normalised data for placebo and TE group across after 90 minutes exercise. In the TE group, statistically significant improvements were observed (ANOVA) in both co-normalised detection score and detection time at this time point (* denotes P<0.05). Normalised identification scores and speeds trended toward significance († denotes P<0.1), whereas no effect was observed for normalised one card learning scores and speeds |
Figure 2: Relationship between score achieved and response time plotted as a percentage of placebo. The ratio score to speed is significantly higher (ANOVA) at 90 minutes for detection (P=0.03) i.e. a higher score was achieved in a faster time. A similar phenomenon was observed for the identification test, which trended towards significance (P=0.1) test |
|
At Rest |
After 45 minutes excercise |
After 90 minutes excercise |
||||||||||
Detection |
Detection |
Detection |
|||||||||||
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
||||||||
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
||
Placebo |
Normalised |
0.95 |
0.04 |
0.60 |
0.10 |
0.99 |
0.00 |
0.49 |
0.01 |
0.97 |
0.02 |
0.52 |
0.03 |
Placebo |
Normalised |
1.02 |
0.02 |
0.43 |
0.03 |
1.03 |
0.01 |
0.39 |
0.05 |
1.03 |
0.02 |
0.43 |
0.02 |
|
Identification |
Identification |
Identification |
||||||||||
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
||||||||
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
||
Placebo |
Normalised |
1.01 |
0.01 |
0.70 |
0.03 |
1.00 |
0.01 |
0.76 |
0.01 |
0.98 |
0.02 |
0.81 |
0.04 |
Placebo |
Normalised |
1.04 |
0.02 |
0.67 |
0.04 |
1.04 |
0.03 |
0.68 |
0.05 |
1.02 |
0.01 |
0.72 |
0.03 |
|
One-card learning |
One-card learning |
One-card learning |
||||||||||
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
||||||||
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
Mean |
± S.E.M |
||
Placebo |
Normalised |
0.98 |
0.02 |
1.40 |
0.08 |
0.96 |
0.03 |
1.31 |
0.06 |
0.98 |
0.02 |
1.42 |
0.06 |
Placebo |
Normalised |
0.95 |
0.04 |
1.43 |
0.05 |
1.04 |
0.04 |
1.56 |
0.06 |
1.00 |
0.04 |
1.35 |
0.07 |
Table 1: Co-normalised data to one back test scores and speeds for each time point, either at rest or after exercise
|
Detection |
Identification |
One card learning |
|||||||||
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
Score |
Speed |
|||||||
Mean |
Mean |
Mean |
Mean |
Mean |
Mean |
|||||||
Treat Standard error of differences F pr |
Active |
Placebo |
Active |
Placebo |
Active |
Placebo |
Active |
Placebo |
Active |
Placebo |
Active |
Placebo |
1.026 |
0.969 |
0.439 |
0.539 |
1.031 |
0.994 |
0.690 |
0.772 |
0.989 |
0.971 |
1.369 |
1.376 |
|
0.027 |
0.046 |
0.018 |
0.037 |
0.041 |
0.071 |
|||||||
0.047 |
0.047 |
0.059 |
0.041 |
0.724 |
0.941 |
Table 2: A repeated measures linear mixed model test identifies significance in detection scores and speeds, plus identification speed. A trend towards effect was reported for identification scores