Total |
Boys |
Girls |
|
Age (years) |
7.7 (0.4) |
7.7 (0.5) |
7.6 (0.3) |
Weight (kg) |
27.3 (5.8) |
27.8 (5.5) |
26.9 (6.0) |
Height (cm) |
129.0 (5.6) |
129.8 (5.2) |
128.2 (5.8) |
BMI (kg/m2) |
16.3 (2.5) |
16.4 (2.4) |
16.2 (2.6) |
Waist Circumference (WC) (cm) |
59.5 (6.3) |
60.0 (6.0) |
59.0 (6.7) |
Waist-to-height ratio |
0.46 (0.03) |
0.46 (0.04) |
0.46 (0.03) |
Under weight subjects’ BMI (kg/m2) |
13.3 (0.5) |
13.5 (0.5) |
13.2 (0.5) |
Normal weight subjects’ BMI (kg/m2) |
15.9 (1.0) |
15.9 (1.2) |
15.9 (1.4) |
Overweight |
19.7 (1.0) |
19.6 (0.9) |
20.0 (1.1) |
Obese subjects’ BMI (kg/m2) |
23.5 (1.7) |
23.4 (1.5) |
23.5 (1.9) |
Percentiles |
BMI |
WC |
W/HtR |
|||
boys |
girls |
boys |
girls |
boys |
girls |
|
3rd |
13.1 |
12.8 |
53.0 |
50.2 |
0.41 |
0.40 |
5th |
13.4 |
13.0 |
54.0 |
51.0 |
0.42 |
0.40 |
10th |
13.9 |
13.6 |
54.0 |
52.0 |
0.42 |
0.41 |
25th |
14.7 |
14.6 |
56.0 |
54.0 |
0.44 |
0.43 |
50th |
16.1 |
15.7 |
59.0 |
57.0 |
0.46 |
0.45 |
75th |
17.5 |
17.1 |
62.0 |
63.0 |
0.47 |
0.48 |
90th |
19.8 |
19.6 |
68.0 |
68.0 |
0.51 |
0.52 |
95th |
21.8 |
22.3 |
73.0 |
75.5 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
97th |
22.8 |
22.7 |
76.0 |
78.0 |
0.57 |
0.56 |
Countries |
WC values (cm) |
Authors |
|
boys |
girls |
||
Our study, Pavia, Northern Italy |
59.0 |
57.0 |
Turconi et al., 2014 |
Pescara, Central Italy |
67.0 |
69.0 |
Zannolli et al., 1996 [35] |
Switzerland |
59.2 |
58.4 |
Aeberli et al., 2011 [24] |
Germany |
58.6 |
57.2 |
Schwandt et al., 2008 [37] |
United Kingdom |
54.7 |
54.1 |
McCarthy et al., 2001 [32] |
Poland |
57.1 |
55.5 |
Ostrowska Nawarycz et al., 2010 [30] |
Turkey |
56.4 |
54.7 |
Hatipoglu et al., 2008 [31] |
Hong Kong |
55.3 |
53.2 |
Sung et al., 2008 [23] |
Shandong, China |
55.8 |
53.7 |
Zhang et al., 2013 [22] |
United States |
59.6 |
58.8 |
Fernandez et al., 2004 [33] |
Mexico City |
62.5 |
60.0 |
Gomez-Diaz et al., 2005 [34] |
Countries |
WC values (cm) |
% of children with |
Authors |
||
boys |
girls |
boys |
girls |
||
Our study, Pavia, Northern Italy |
68.0 |
68.0 |
|
|
Turconi et al., 2014 |
Pescara, Central Italy |
77.0 |
79.7 |
1.8 |
0.8 |
Zannolli et al., 1996[35] |
Switzerland |
67.0 |
66.4 |
10.3 |
11.0 |
Aeberli et al., 2011[24] |
Germany |
67.5 |
65.8 |
9.5 |
11.4 |
Schwandt et al., 2008[37] |
United Kingdom |
60.9 |
60.4 |
28.4 |
29.8 |
McCarthy et al., 2001[32] |
Poland |
66.7 |
64.2 |
10.8 |
15.2 |
Ostrowska Nawarycz et al., 2010[30] |
Turkey |
64.4 |
61.9 |
16.4 |
25.2 |
Hatipoglu et al., 2008[31] |
Hong Kong |
66.6 |
61.6 |
10.1 |
26.6 |
Sung et al., 2008[23] |
Shandong, China |
70.0 |
64.0 |
6.7 |
15.2 |
Zhang et al., 2013[22] |
Mexico City |
79.9 |
73.8 |
1.3 |
5.2 |
Gomez-Diaz et al., 2005[34] |
Santiago (Chile) |
77.8 |
77.9 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
Avalos et al., 2012[36] |
![]() |
Figure 1: BMI distribution according to Cole’s reference standard percentiles |