ANNEX PUBLISHERS

Journal of Hematology and Blood Disorders

ISSN: 2455-7641

Open Access
Research Article
Max Screen

Profile of Adult Lymphomas in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Monocentric Study of Histoimmunochemical Aspects

Received Date: August 11, 2021 Accepted Date: September 08, 2021 Published Date: September 10, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Fall S. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Related article at Pubmed, Google Scholar

Abstract

Introduction: In sub-Saharan Africa, few studies have integrated histological examination with immunostaining ; and our aim was to clarify the histoimmunochemical particularities of lymphoma diagnosed in adult.

Methods: A retrospective (September 2016 - December 2019) descriptive and analytical study concerned an exhaustive recruitment of patients followed at Clinical Haematology Department in Senegal for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or non- Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) selected on the basis of a histoimmunochemical examination, epidemiological, diagnostic, therapeutic and evolutionary data were analysed.

Results: A total of 26 NHL patients (56.5%) and 20 LH cases (43.5%), aged 32-11 and 51-18 years respectively, were selected. Polyadenopathy was noted in 95% of cases of HL and 73.1% of cases of NHL (p=0.002). Patients were at Ann Arbor Stage II-IV in 80% of cases for the NHL and 70% of cases for HL (p: 0 ,317). Type B-Cell NHL entities were Diffuse Large Cell B Lymphoma (34.6%), Follicular Lymphoma (15.4%), Mantle Lymphoma (7.7%), Lymphocytic Lymphoma (7.7%), and Malt Lymphoma (3.8%). The NHL was type T-Cell in 30.8% of cases including 19.2% of anaplastic lymphoma. The HL were classic (80%) and nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (20%). Specific treatment was performed in 82.6% of cases, 28.9% of which were immunochemotherapy. Remission was noted in 52.4% of NHL patients and 70.3% of those with HL.

Conclusion: Our study confirms the immunohistochemical diversity of lymphomas in patients receiving advanced stages of the disease, who have little access to targeted therapy. It remains to make available immunohistochemical and molecular explorations to better define the characteristics of lymphoma in africa.

Keywords: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; Hodgkin’s Lymphoma; Histoimmunolabelling; Africa

Introduction

The prevalence of lymphomas is increasing in sub-Saharan Africa, but their incidence is unknown, given the difficulty of setting up a cancer registry [1,2]. The publications most often concern regional single-center or multicenter hospital studies [2-8]. In Senegal, NHL accounted for 45.4% of the causes of hospitalization related to hematologic malignancies [8]. Cytological and histological criteria without immunostaining are often used in the diagnosis of lymphomas from publications in black Africa [2]. This is linked to the difficulties in accessing the immunohsitochemical examination necessary for the WHO classification of natural lymphoid neoplasms [9]. The difficulties are linked to a lack of quality technical platforms on the one hand and staff training [1,2]. For this, initiatives have been developed with partnerships from advanced countries to make available complete pathological examinations, the basis of an objective classification, from which relevant data can be used [1,2]. In Senegal, immunohistochemistry is unavailable, and immunochemotherapy for hematologic malignancies is not subsidized. In sub-Saharan Africa, few of studies have integrated immunohistochemical arguments in the diagnosis of lymphomas [1-6]. We have therefore undertaken this work, with the aim of better specifying the pathological and evolutionary entities of lymphomas diagnosed in adults. The specific objectives were to describe the socio-epidemiological, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects and to determine the prognostic factors.

Methods

This is a descriptive retrospective study from September 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 conducted at the Clinical Hematology Ser- vice of Dalal Jamm Hospital (Senegal) which is a reference center in Oncohematology. We carried out an exhaustive recruitment of patient files followed for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The diagnosis of lymphoma was clinicaly suspected, then retained on pathological examination which included immunostaining data (immunochemistry, immunophe- notyping and / or fluorescence in situ hybridization) from tissue biopsy and / or organ sent by private laboratories in Senegal to dedicated Anatomy laboratories in France. The diagnosis of lymphoma was made on the basis of the 2016 WHO criteria [9]. The tumor mass was assessed using the Ann Arbor classification [10,11]. Depending on their financial situation, patients received in hospital or in outpatient either conventional chemotherapy: CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, Prednisone) COP (Cyclophosphamide, vincristine, Prednisone), ACVP (Bleomycin, Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, Prednisone) ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, Vinblastine, Decitabine), or immunochemotherapy (Rituximab and conventional chemothera- py).. The evolutionary data (clinical, computed tomography) were for the complete response (CR): disappearance of signs and mass and / or less than 1.5 cm, the uncertain complete response (UCR): residual mass greater than 1.5 cm or regression 75%, partial response (PR): less than 50% of tumor mass, stability (SD) and progression (PD): tumor evolution; according to Cheson’s criteria [12]. Remission included CR, UCR and PR.

Were analyzed the data, socio-epidemiological, diagnostic, anatomopathological subtypes of lymphoma, therapeutic and evolutionary. The Kaplan Meier survival curve was established. The analyzes were descriptive (mean, standard deviation; median with extremes, frequency) and analytical (Chi2 test considered significant for a p value< 0.05).

Results

Out of a total of 63 files identified, 17 lymphomas that were proven only on histological examination were excluded and 46 retained records consisted of 26 NHL cases (56.5%) and 20 HL cases (43.5%).

Epidemiologically (Table 1) 90% of patients with HL and 38.4% of NHL cases are under the age of 45 (p: 0.1 10-3). The sex ratio was 1.22 for the HL and 0.85 for the NHL (p: 0.552). Symptoms at admission (Table 1) are alteration of the state general observed in 50% of patients who were in stage 3-4 of WHO. Cervical polyadenopathy was noted in 95% of HL cases and 73.1% of NHL cases (p: 0.002). Extranodal location was particularly cutaneous (23%), pleuropulmonary (11.5%) and digestive (7.6%) over the NHL. The comorbidities were hypertension (4 cases), diabetes (3 cases), viral hepatitis B co-infection (10 cases). None of our patients had HIV.

In histoimmunochemical analysis (Table 2), type B-cell NHL (B-NHL) are represented by diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in 34.6% of cases, follicular lymphoma (FL) in 15.4% of cases, mantle lymphoma in 7.7% of cases, lymphocytic lymphoma in 7,7% of cases and in Malt lymphoma in 3.8% of cases. DLBCL was a germinative centre in 33.3% of cases. The NHL was T- cell (T- NHL) in 30.8% of cases including 19.2% of anaplastic lymphoma.

Hodgkin lymphoma observations were labelled classic in 80% of cases and nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma in 20% of cases.

Prognostically, 80% of the NHL and 70% of the HL were at Stage III - IV of Ann ARBOR (p: 0.317). Specific treatment (Table 3) was performed in 82.6% of patients among whom 28.9% received immunochemotherapy. Remission was noted in 52.4% of NHL patients, 42.9% of whom were in complete reponse. Concerning the HL, the evolution was marked by 70.3% of remission including 41.2% of complète reponse. The median time to follow-up of patients was 888.7 days (37-1247 days). The median survival time was 852 days [37-1078 days] for DLBCL 864 days [597-1131 days] for FL, 305 days [124-486 days] for T-cell NHL and 1026 days [805 - 1247 days] for HL. The percentage of overall survival at 1 year, was 100% for FL, 85.6% for DLBCL, 82.3% for HL and 42% for T-cell NHL (Figure 1). At 3 year, overall survival was 78% for FL, 65% for HL and 43% for DLBCL, (Figure 1).

Comments

Lymphomas are dominated by the NHL which represented half in our series (56.5%), and nearly ninety percent (87.8%) of lym- phomas selected on cytohistological criteria in Togo [4]. The NHL is also the first mature lymphoid neoplasia in sub-Saharan Black Africa [3,5,6] and Magreb [7]. The NHL is diagnosed in the mid-fifties [2,3,6] in the African population, which is younger than the Western population [13]. In our study, HL is the least common entity, and it occurs in young adults (32 ± 11 years); which corroborates with certain african studies [2-6].

Revealing symptoms are dominated by polyadenopathy in our series (89.1%) and in Ndiaye et al [8] ( 75%) of Omoti et al [3] with 67.7% lymph node location. This nodal involvement is particularly cervical during HL [3,14]. Extranodal locations, such as skin, pleuro-pulmoaire and digestive, are much more described during the NHL [2], and are not uncommon in patients with HL [14]. In our regions, the difficulty to specify the primary or secondary extranodal NHL is linked on the one hand to the long delay of consultation responsible for the advanced stage of disease at diagnosis and on the other hand to a inefficent technical explorations platform [1,2].

Type B NHL immunohistochemical entities are dominated by DLBCL in our study (34.6%), as published by ElIdrissi et al [7] (47.5%). This finding is also made in a large series compiled in Sub-Saharan and Southern Africa which reported 48.8% of DLCBL [2]. Similarly in Europe, the DLBCL represents a fifth (40.9%) of the NHL [13]. It is most often a germinative centre type DLBCL [15]. Besides DLBCL, follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second immunohistochemical entity of NHL in our study, as described in sub-Saharan publications [3]. Lymphocytic lymphoma and Malt-type and marginal-zone lymphoma are the least common in our regions [3]. We do not have Burkitt lymphoma which is poorly reported in immunocompetent adult subjects in Senegal [8], as noted in our study. NHL with less represented T-cell than B-cell forms. T-cell NHL are also characterized by a diversity of immunohistochic forms dominated by anaplastic lymphoma [2]; This is also noted in our study. As for the NHL, the profile of HL entities is polymorphic, dominated by the classical type including nodular sclerosis with lymphocytic predominance [16], unlike nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma which is poorly reported [13].

On a prognosis basis, three-quarters of our patients were at an advanced stage of the disease; This is consistent with the findings of other publications [2,3]. This is due to the diagnostic delay related to the accessibility of responsible scans.

Therapeutically, we observe an underuse of immunotherapy, which results from the inaccessibility of immunophenotyping and molecular biolog [1,17], explaining in our patients the polymorphic evolutionary profile of B-cell NHL, which was better during FL. These difficulties of therapeutic access justify the use of ABVD during the advanced stages of HL, explaining the rate of complete reponse obtained by our patients.

Conclusion

Our study confirms the immunohistochemical diversity of lymphomas in patients receiving advanced stages of the disease, who have little access to targeted therapy that is not readily available. It remains to make available immunohistochemical and molecular explorations to better define the characteristics of lymphomas in Africa.

Financial Disclosure Statement, and Conflict of Interest

All authors declare to have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence their work.

1 Painschab, M.S., Westmoreland, K.D., Tomoka,, T. (2020) Improving outcomes for non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Sub-Saharan Africa: where to start?. British Journal of Haematology, 190, 139–140. https: //doi.org/ 10.1111/bjh.16617
2 Mezger, N.C.S., Feuchtner, J., Griesel, M., Hämmerl, L., Seraphin, T.P., Zietsman, A. (2020) ClInical presentation and diagnosis of adult patients with non‐Hodgkin lymphoma in Sub‐Saharan Africa .British Journal Haematology,190, 209-221. https: //doi. org/10.1111/bhj. 16575
3 Omoti, CE., Halim, N.K.D. (2005) Adult lymphomas in Edo state, Niger Delta region of Nigeria clinicopathological profile of 205 cases. Clinical and Laboratory Haematology, 27, 302–306. https: //doi.org/ 10. 1111/j.1365-2257.2005.00711.x
4 Amégbor, K., Darré, T., Padaro, E., Pegbessou, E.P., Bagny,•A., Napo-Koura, G. (2010) Epidemiology and pathological profile of lymphomas in Togo: about 755 cases observed in the Tokoin hospital of Lomé. African Journal of Cancer, 2, 235-239. https: //doi. org/ 10.1007/s12558-010-0121-1
5 Koulidiati, J., Ouedraogo, D.D., Tieno H, Bationo, B., Kafando, E,. Drabo, Y.J. (2015) Hematological malignancies of the adult in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Revue de CAMES Santé, 3(2),10-12.
6 Tomoka, T., Montgomery, N.D., Powers, E., Dhungel, B.M., Morgan, E.A., Mulenga, M., et al. (2018) Lymphoma and Patholo- gy in Sub-Saharan Africa: Current Approaches and Future Directions. Clinics In Laboratory Medicine , 38, 91–100. https: //doi. org/10.1016/j.cll.2017.10.007
7 Elidrissi Errahhali, M., Elidrissi Errahhali, .M., Boulouiz, R., Ouarzane, M., Bellaoui, M. (2016)Distribution and features of he- matological malignancies in Eastern Morocco: a retrospective multicenter study over 5 years. BMC Cancer,16, 159, 1-10. https: // doi.org/ 10.1186/s12885-016-2205-5.
8 Ndiaye, F.S.D., Fall, S., Faye, A., Diagne, N., Ndaw, A.C., Djiba, B., et al. (2015) Prognostic factors of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: retrospective study in Unit Blood Service of the Internal Medicine Dantec in Dakar (Senegal). Open Journal of Hematology, 6, 1 - 6.
9 Swerdlow, S.H., Campo, E., Pileri, S.A., Harris, N.L., Stein H, Siebert R et al. (2016) The 2016 revision of the World Health Orga- nization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood,127, 2375-2390. https: //doi.org/ 10.1182/blood-2016-01-643569
10 Rosenberg, SA. (1977) Validity of the Ann Arbor staging classification for the non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Cancer Treatement Reports, 61,1023-1027.
11 Lister, T.A., Crowther, D., Sutcliffe, S.B, Glatstein, E., Canellos,G.P. Young, R.C., Rosenberg,S.A., et al. (1989) Report of a com- mittee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds Meeting. Journal of Clinical Oncology,7,1630- 1636. https: //doi.org/ 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1630
12 Cheson, B.D., Horning, S.J., Coiffier, B., Shipp,M.A., Fisher, J.M., Connors,J.M.,et al. (1999) Report of an International Work- shop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: NCI Sponsored International Working Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17,1244-1253. https: //doi.org/ 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.4.1244
13 Smith, A., Crouch, S., Lax, S., Li, J., Painter, D., Howell, D., Patmore, R., Jack, A., et al. (2015) Lymphoma incidence, survival and prevalence 2004–2014: sub-type analyses from the UK’s Haematological Malignancy Research Network. British Journal of Cancer, 112, 1575–1584. https: //doi.org/ 10.1038/bjc.2015.94
14 Eddo-Olu, A.N., Omoti, C.E. (2011) Hodgkin lymphoma: Clinicopathologic features in Benin City, Nigeria and update on its biology and classification. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice,14 (4), 440-444.
15 Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F., Deeb, G., Zizani, P.L., Pileri, S.A., Macon, W.R., Goy, A. (2011) Higher response to lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma in nongerminal center B‐cell–like than in germinal center B‐cell–like pheno- type. Cancer, (117) 22, 5058-5066. https: //doi.org/ 10. 1002/cncr.26135
16 Zeggai, S., Harir, N., Belkacem, A., Tou, A., Sellam, F., Mrabent, N.M., et al. (2016) Clinical-pathological features and histolog- ical variants of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a study of 526 patients. Egyptian Journal of Haematology, 41,140–143. https: //doi.org/ 10. 4103/1110-1067.196218
17 Perry, A.M., Perner, Y., Diebold, J., Nathwani, K.A., Maclennan, K.A. Müller-Hermelink, H.K., et al. (2015) Non‐Hodgkin lymphoma in Southern Africa: review of 487 cases from The International Non‐Hodgkin Lymphoma Classification Project. British Journal of Haematology, 101, 1244-1250. https: //doi.org/10.1111bjh.13885

Journal of Hematology and Blood Disorders

Tables at a glance
table-icon
Table 1
table-icon
Table 2
table-icon
Table 3
Figures at a glance
image-icon
Figure 1
DLBCL: Diffuse large B Cell Lymphoma; FL: Follicular lymphoma; T- Cell NHL: T-cell non hodgkin lymphoma; Other B-cell Lymphoma lymphocytic lymphoma, Mantle lymphoma, Malt lymphoma; HL: Hodgkin Lymphoma
Figure 1: Overall survival curve according type of lymphomas

 

 

Signs

Type of lymphoma

 

 

P

HL

NHL

LN PL (N=
4)
n

 

SN (N=
11)
n

 

RL (N=
4)
n

 

CM (N=
1)
n

TN
HL (N
20)
n (%)

DL CL (N=
9)
n

FL N= (N=
4)
n

 

Mant (N=
2)
n

LL N= (N=
2)
n

 

Malt (N=
1)
n

T NHL (N=
8)
n

TN NHL (N =
26) n (%)

 

 

Age (years )

M± SD

36
±19

33
±12

33
±14

30

32 ±
11

52
±15

53
±5

62
±20

63
±2

40

42
±19

51
±18

 

 

0,01
10-2

[20-45[

3

10

4

1

18
(90)

3

1

 

 

 

6

10
(38,5)

[45-65[

0

0

0

0

0
(0)

2

3

1

2

 

1

9
(34,6)

>65

1

1

 

 

2
(10)

4

 

1

 

 

2

7
(26,9)

 

Gender

 

H F

 

2
2

 

7
4

 

1
3

 

1
0

11
(55)
9
(45)

 

5
4

 

1
3

 

1
1

 

1
1

 

1

 

12
(46,1)
14
(53,8)

 

0,55

Symptoms B*

2

8

3

1

13
(65)

4

1

1

1

0

 

8
(30,8)

0,036

GA

2

5

1

1

9
(45)

5

1

2

2

0

4

14
(54)

0,076

 

Lymph nodes

cervical

4

10

4

1

19
(95)

7

3

2

2

 

 

19
(73,1)

 

0,002

Axillary

1

7

2

1

11
(55)

4

3

1

2

 

4

1       4
(53,8)

Inguinal

2

5

1

1

9
(45)

4

1

1

1

 

4

11
(42,3)

Spléno
mégalie

1

0

0

1

2
(10)

 

 

 

 

1

 

1
(3,8)

_

Cutaneous

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

 

 

 

5

6
(23)

_

Pleuro-
Pulmonary

0

1

0

0

1
(5)

2

1

 

 

 

 

3
(11,5)

 

Digestive

0

0

0

0

0

1

 

 

 

 

1

2
(7,6)

_

N: lymphoma count; n: effective positive markers; (%): percentage; M: mean . SD: Standart Deviation; *hyperthermia, weight loss, sweating; GE: General Alteration; NPL: Nodular predominantly lymphocytes; NS: Nodular Sclerosis; RL: Rich in Lymphocytes; CM: Mixed Cellulary; DLBCL: Diffus Large B Cell Lymphoma; FL: Follicular Lymphoma; Mant: Mantle lymphoma; Malt: Malt Lymphoma; LL: Lymphocytic Lymphoma; TL: T cell Lymphoma; TN HL: Number Hodgkin Lympoma; TN NHL: Total Number Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ; p: p value
Table 1: Socio-epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the study population

Lymphoma type

n /N (%)

Immunohistochemical expression

NHL (N= 26)

 

B-NHL

DLBCL

9 (34.6)

CD20, CD3,   CD79B,   CD5,CD10,
CD45, BCL2, BCL6, MUM1, Ki67

Follicular

4 (15,4)

CD20,CD79,CD10, BCL2, BCL6

Mantle lymphoma

2 (7.7)

CD20,CD79,CD5,CD10,MUM1

lymphocytic lymphoma

2 (7.7)

CD20, CD5,CD23,BCL2, MUM1

Malt lymphoma

1 (3,8)

CD20, CD79

T-NHL

Anaplasic lymphoma

5 (19, 3)

CD3,CD30, CD4, CD5, EMA, ALK

Lymphoblastic lymphoma

2 (7.7)

CD3,CD5,CD10, CD7, CD34, Ki67

Sezary lymphoma

1 (3,8)

CD20,CD5

HL (N=20)

 

Classic

Rich in lymphocytes

4 (20)

CD20,CD30,CD15,CD3,CD79a

Nodular sclerosis

11 (55)

CD30,CD15,CD3, EMA

Mixed cellulary

1 (5)

CD20,CD30,CD3

Nodular lymphocyte
predominant Hodgkin lymphoma

4 (20)

CD20,           CD30,CD15,CD3,CD79a,
CD45, CD5, CD23, EMA

n: effective positive markers; N: lymphoma count; (%): percentage; NHL: Non Hodgkin Lymphoma;
B-NHL: B-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma; T-NHL: T-Cell Non Hodgkin Lymphoma; HL: Hodgkin Lympoma
Table 2: Key Markers of B-cell NHL histological subtypes

Type of Lymphoma

Protocol

Total

CVP

CHOP

RCHOP

R
ACVP

ABVD

R-ABVD

 

NHL n (%)

3(14,3)

7 (33.3)

7 (33.3)

2 (9.5)

2 (9.5)

 

21

HL n (%)

 

 

 

 

15(88.2)

2 (11.8)

17

 

Response to Treatment

 

CR

PR

PD

SD

Death

LS

 

NHL n (%)

9 (42.9)

2 (9.5)

2 (9.5)

1 (4.8)

3 (14,3)

4 (19)

21

HL n (%)

7 (41,2)

5 (29.4)

1 (5.9)

1 (5.9)

0 ( 0 )

3 (17,7)

17

n: effective; %: percentage; CR: Complete reponse; PR: Partial response; Progressive disease; Stable disease; LS: Lost sight; CHOP: Cyclophosphamid, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, Prednisone; COP: Cyclophosphamid, Vincristine, Prednisone; ACVP: Bleomycin, Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, Prednisone; ABVD: Doxorubicin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, Decitabine; R: Rituximab
Table 3: Treatment response according lymphoma type

Partnered Content Networks

  • Cancer Science
  • Vaccine Studies
  • Gynecology
  • Food Nutrition
  • Nursing Science
  • Public Health
  • The Pharma
  • Infectious Disease
  • Neuro Care
  • Catalysis
  • Neonatal Biology
  • Neonatal Disorders
  • Mutation
  • Nanotechnology
  • Toxicology
  • Dark Biotechnology
  • Pollution Toxicology
  • Cell Biology
  • Bioanalytical Research
  • Renal Disorders
  • The Astrophysics
  • Sleep Physiology
  • Epidemiology
  • Histology