ANNEX PUBLISHERS

Clinical and Experimental Research in Cardiology

ISSN: 2394-6504

Open Access
Research Article
Max Screen

Can Vitamin D Deficiency be a Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease? A Large Cross-Sectional Study of Patients Referred to Cardiovascular Clinic

Received Date: April 23, 2021 Accepted Date: May 18, 2021 Published Date: May 20, 2021

Copyright: © 2021 Kojuri J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Related article at Pubmed, Google Scholar

Abstract

Background:Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common form of CVD. To prevent CAD we need to assess the risk of future CAD in all patients referred for cardiovascular care, but each of the several available systems for risk assessment has its own limitations. This study was designed to determine whether vitamin D deficiency is a potential risk factor for CAD.

Method:Between 2018 and 2020 we conducted a large cross-sectional population-based study of 4526 patients in Shiraz, Iran. All patients underwent selective coronary angiography via a radial artery approach by an expert interventional cardiologist. Serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured in all patients.

Results:Mean vitamin D level was lower in patients with significant CAD (27.2±14.8) than in patients with non-significant CAD (29.5±14.8). The difference was statistically significant (p< 0.001). There was no correlation between vitamin D and hsCRP levels (rho=0.04, p=0.204). Vitamin D deficiency was more frequent in men (2499, 70.4%) than women (1486, 58.6%). This difference was statistically significant (p< 0.001).

Conclusion:Our findings show a significant association between vitamin D deficiency and the prevalence of CAD independent of hs-CRP level, and suggest a correlation between vitamin D levels and the severity of CAD. In addition, mean 25-hydroxy vitamin D level was lower in men than in women.(Clinical trial.gov registration number: NCT04651101).

Keywords: Coronary Artery Disease; Vitamin D Deficiency

Introduction

Vitamin D is a steroid fat-soluble vitamin with important roles in bone metabolism and metabolic, cardiovascular and dermatologic tissues [1]. Vitamin D receptors have been detected in myocytes, cardiomyocytes, pancreatic beta cells, vascular endothelial cells, neurons, immune cells, and osteoblasts [2]. It is known that vitamin D plays favorable roles in the immune-inflammatory process of atherosclerosis, and also has positive effects in conditions that can accelerate atherosclerosis such as dyslipidemia, insulin resistance and the complications of hypertension. Vitamin D needs two hydroxylation steps to become active. Initial hydroxylation occurs in the liver and forms 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25 (OH)D). The second hydroxylation occurs mostly in the kidneys, and forms 1,25-hydroxy vitamin D. The main active form of vitamin D3 is 1,25-(OH)2D3, but as an indicator of vitamin D status at the whole-body level, 25-hydroxy vitamin D is used [3].

Recent studies have shown a close relationship between CAD and vitamin D deficiency [4-6]. Moreover, low serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D can be an absolute risk marker for cardiovascular events and mortality [7]. However, some studies have disputed this connection [8,9]. Jarrah et al., for example, found no significant association between vitamin D abnormalities and the incidence of CAD [10].

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is known to be an acute-phase reactant inflammatory marker often present in atherosclerotic lesions [11]. High levels of hs-CRP are associated with an increased risk of CAD because this protein contributes to atherogenesis, plaque formation and plaque rupture [12].

Because of the controversial nature of the association between vitamin D levels and the occurrence of CAD, this study was designed to determine whether serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level was associated with CAD in large group of patients, and to determine whether vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for CAD.

Methods

The clinical data for this cross‐sectional study in Shiraz, Iran, were collected from patients referred to Professor Kojuri Cardiovascular Clinic in Shiraz, Iran (Email: kojurij@yahoo.com, webpage: http://kojuriclinic.com/) from March 2018 to March 2020. The inclusion criterion was new symptomatic patients referred to Professor Kojuri Cardiovascular Clinic during the study period and were suspicious to have coronary artery disease based on non-invasive tests . The exclusion criteria were serum level of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 higher than 100 ng/mL, parathyroid disorders, end-stage renal disease, and paraneoplastic syndromes. Patients whose serum level of hs-CRP was higher than 10 mg/L were also excluded.

Complete history was noted and the findings on physical examination were recorded for all patients, and risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, age and gender were considered. In all patients 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 level and blood pressure were recorded, and electrocardiographic tracings were obtained. The dependent variable was the prevalence of CAD, the independent variable was vitamin D deficiency, and intervening factors were age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and level of hs-CRP.

All patients underwent selective coronary angiography via a radial artery approach by an expert interventional cardiologist. Angiography videos were reviewed by a team of expert cardiologists; based on the results, significant CAD is defined as >50% stenosis of the left main stem or >70% stenosis in a major coronary vessels. Diabetes was defined according to ADA 2018 criteria [13], and hypertension was defined according to ACC/AHA 2017 criteria [14]. Serum level of 25-hydroxy vitamin D on the patient’s first visit was used as an index of vitamin D level. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as a serum level of 25-hydroxy vitamin D less than 30 ng/mL, and sufficiency was defined as a serum level of 25-hydroxy vitamin D greater than 30 ng/mL [15].

For statistical analyses we used IBM SPSS software version 25. Independent-sample t tests and one-way ANOVA were used for parametric variables. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for nonparametric data. We used Pearson correlation for continuous variables. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

All patients were informed about the details of this research, and provided their written informed consent. Patients who declined to participate in the study were excluded. The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences under code IR.SUMS.MED.REC.1398.246.

Results

During the study period 4526 new patients were referred to Professor Kojuri Cardiovascular Clinic. 292 patients were excluded based on the exclusion criteria, and vitamin D was measured in the remaining 4234 patients (2490 men [58.8%] and 1744 women [41.2%]). Mean age of the patients in this study was 64.89 ±10.7 years (Table 1).

All 4234 patients underwent coronary angiography. According to the results, 1053 patients (24.9%) were considered to have nonsignificant CAD, and the remaining 3181 patients (75.1%) were considered to have significant CAD.

Mean vitamin D level was 27.78±14.69 ng/mL. Vitamin D deficiency was found in 2755 patients (65.1%), and sufficiency was found in 1479 patients (34.9%) (Table 2).

Vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent in patients with significant CAD (2142, 67.3%) than in patients with non-significant CAD (613, 58.2%). This relationship was statistically significant (p< 0.001) (Figure 1). Mean vitamin D level was lower in patients with significant CAD (27.2±14.8 ng/ml) than in patients with non-significant CAD (29.5±14.8 ng/ml). The difference was statistically significant (p< 0.001) (Figure 2). In patients with significant CAD, patients with higher syntax scores had lower vitamin D (p=0.008, rho: -0.047). Syntax scores were lower in patients with vitamin D sufficiency than in patients with vitamin D deficiency, but the difference was statistically non-significant (p=0.21). There was no significant difference in the number of diseased vessels between the two groups of patients with vitamin D deficiency and patients with sufficient amounts of vitamin D (P=0.106).

We also assessed the relationship between hs-CRP and vitamin D. Mean hs-CRP level in this sample of patients was 1.8 ±2.1 mg/L. We found no correlation between vitamin D and hs-CRP levels (rho=0.04, p=0.204).

We found that vitamin D deficiency was significantly more frequent in men (2499, 70.4%) than in women (1486, 58.6%) (p< 0.001).

Discussion

Although several studies have reported an association between vitamin D deficiency and CAD, some studies found no such association. In light of the unresolved discrepancies between different studies, we conducted this cross-sectional study of 4234 patients from the general population to search for evidence of this association.

Wang and colleagues, in their analysis of data from the Framingham Offspring Study of 1739 participants who were followed for 5.4 years, showed that vitamin D deficiency was associated with CVD. However, in that study vitamin D deficiency was defined as levels lower than 15 ng/mL, whereas we considered levels lower than 30 ng/mL as vitamin D deficiency [16]. Watson et al. showed that higher serum levels of vitamin D were inversely associated with coronary calcification [17]. In a cross-sectional study of 315 patients by Dhibar et al., the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was very high but did not correlate with CAD severity [18]. It should be noted, however, that the sample size in their study was small. Chen et al. concluded that low vitamin D levels were associated with CAD severity [19]. These authors assessed the severity of CAD with the SYNTAX score in a sample of 348 patients. Sogomonian et al. showed that serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentrations were inversely correlated with the percentage of coronary artery stenosis in their sample of 9399 patients [20]. In another cohort study, Schöttker et al. showed that vitamin D deficiency was strongly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality [21]. In addition, a metaanalysis by Sokol et al. concluded that there was a modest increase in the risk of cardiovascular events with low levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 [22].

Manousak and colleagues, in their subsequent metaanalysis, concluded that genetically lowered levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D were not associated with a higher risk of CAD [23]. However, an earlier metaanalysis and systematic review by Elamin and colleagues showed that trial data did not support an association between vitamin D and a reduction in mortality or cardiovascular risk [24]. Pittas et al. concluded that the association between vitamin D level and cardiometabolic outcomes was uncertain [25].

The most notable findings in the present study were that CAD severity correlated with vitamin D deficiency, and that vitamin D deficiency was associated with a higher prevalence of CAD. Another positive aspect of the present study was our comparatively large sample size of more than 4000 patients.

The results of the present study showed that vitamin D deficiency was associated with CAD prevalence independently of hs-CRP level. Ridker et al. concluded that CRP level can be a predictor of cardiovascular events [26]. Haverkate et al. demonstrated an association between high serum CRP levels and the prevalence of coronary events in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and unstable angina [27]. Faivre and colleagues showed that low vitamin D levels were inversely correlated with hs-CRP levels in the general population [28]. However, Milajerdi et al. found that vitamin D level did not influence hs-CRP level [29]. In their metaanalysis, Chen et al. showed that vitamin D supplementation was able to lower hs-CRP levels [30].

In the present study, the mean level of 25-hydroxy vitamin D was significantly higher in women than in men. However, an earlier study of 3879 participants showed that 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels were higher in men. Muscogiuri et al. found that vitamin D deficiency was more common in females than males [31]. Nonetheless, a metaanalysis by Hagenau et al. showed that mean serum levels of vitamin D were higher in women [32]. There were significant association between the level of vitamin D deficiency and age, sex, and DM (table1), which rise the possibility of role of these risk factors as confounding factors in the CAD group. So although the possibility of relation of vitamin D and CAD is very high there may be correlation through these risk factor of CAD, and it warrants further studies to evaluate these associations.

Conclusion

Our findings support a significant association between vitamin D deficiency and the prevalence of CAD independently of hs-CRP level, and a correlation between vitamin D levels and CAD severity. Furthermore, we found that 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels were lower in men, diabetics and older patients. These results thus support the notion that vitamin D deficiency can be a risk factor for CAD.

Study limitations

The sample of patients in our study was from a single region in Iran, and our data were from a single cardiology subspecialty clinic. Because vitamin D levels are influenced by race and region, our findings should not be extrapolated to other samples of patients. Another limitation was that CAD severity was classified only according to the percentage of stenosis, although severity can also be classified on the basis of the type of lesion, number of diseased vessels, and other criteria such as those used in the Gensini score. A further limitation was that this was a cross-sectional study, so we cannot assess the possible causal relationship between CAD and vitamin D. Our recommendation is to perform a randomized controlled study to test the ability of vitamin D supplementation to prevent and treat CAD and its risk factors.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shiraz University of Medical Sciences for providing ethical review and approval of our protocol, and K. Shashok (AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean) for improving the use of English in the manuscript.

Author contributions

MMP: Gathering data, randomization, writing the article, data analysis

RG: Study conduction, gathering data, randomization, statistical analysis, writing article

RH: Study conduction, randomization, statistical analysis, writing article

MR: Study conduction, gathering data, randomization

AA: Gathering data, randomization

BZ: Gathering data, randomization

MM: Gathering data, randomization

JK: Main researcher, study idea and protocol, study conduction, gathering data, randomization, statistical analysis, writing article

1 Giustina A (2019) Controversies in Vitamin D: Summary Statement From an International Conference. J Clin Endocrinol Metab104: 234-40.
2 Holick MF, Chen TC (2008) Vitamin D deficiency: a worldwide problem with health consequences. Am J Clin Nutr 87: 1080-6
3 Kassi e (2013) Role of vitamin D in atherosclerosis. Circulation 128: 2517-31.
4 Norouzi H (2019) Association of vitamin D deficiency and premature coronary artery disease. Caspian J Intern Med 10: 80-5.
5 Kunadian V (2014) Vitamin D deficiency and coronary artery disease: a review of the evidence. Am Heart J 167: 283-91.
6 Siasos G (2013) Vitamin D serum levels are associated with cardiovascular outcome in coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol168: 4445-7.
7 Pilz S (2013) The role of vitamin D deficiency in cardiovascular disease: where do we stand in 2013? Arch Toxicol 87: 2083-103.
8 Jassal SK (2010) Vitamin d, parathyroid hormone, and cardiovascular mortality in older adults: the Rancho Bernardo study. Am J Med 123: 1114-20.
9 Bolland MJ (2010) Vitamin D insufficiency and health outcomes over 5 y in older women. Am J Clin Nutr 91: 82-9.
10 Jarrah MI (2018) The association between the serum level of vitamin D and ischemic heart disease: a study from Jordan. Vasc Health Risk Manag 14: 119-27.
11 Hirschfield GM, Pepys MB (2003) C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease: new insights from an old molecule. Qjm 96: 793-807.
12 Verma S, Szmitko PE, Ridker PM (2005) C-reactive protein comes of age. Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine 2: 29-36.
13 Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes (2018) Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care 41: S13-S27.
14 Whelton PK (2017) ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 71: e13-e115.
15 Holick MF (2011) Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96: 1911-30.
16 Wang TJ (2008) Vitamin D deficiency and risk of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 117: 503-11.
17 Watson KE (1997) Active serum vitamin D levels are inversely correlated with coronary calcification. Circulation 96: 1755-60.
18 Dhibar DP (2016) Association of Vitamin D Deficiency with Coronary Artery Disease. J Clin Diagn Res 10: 24-8.
19 Chen WR (2014) The effects of low vitamin D on coronary artery disease. Heart Lung Circ 23: 314-9.
20 Sogomonian R (2016) Serum vitamin D levels correlate to coronary artery disease severity: a retrospective chart analysis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 14: 977-82.
21 Schöttker B (2013) Strong associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer, and respiratory disease mortality in a large cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 97: 782-93.
22 Sokol SI (2011) Vitamin D status and risk of cardiovascular events: lessons learned via systematic review and meta-analysis.Cardiol Rev 19: 192-201.
23 Manousaki D (2016) Mendelian Randomization Studies Do Not Support a Role for Vitamin D in Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 9: 349-56.
24 Elamin MB (2011) Vitamin D and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96: 1931-42.
25 Pittas AG (2010) Systematic review: Vitamin D and cardiometabolic outcomes. Ann Intern Med 152: 307-14.
26 Ridker PM (1997) Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 336:973-9.
27 Haverkate F (1997) Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet 349: 462-6.
28 Haverkate F (1997) Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet 349: 462-6.
29 Milajerdi A (2019) The effects of vitamin D treatment on glycemic control, serum lipid profiles, and C-reactive protein in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Urol Nephrol 51: 1567-80
30 Chen N (2014) Effect of vitamin D supplementation on the level of circulating high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 6: 2206-16.
31 Muscogiuri G (2019) Sex Differences of Vitamin D Status across BMI Classes: An Observational Prospective Cohort Study. Nutrients 11.
32 Hagenau T (2009) Global vitamin D levels in relation to age, gender, skin pigmentation and latitude: an ecologic meta-regression analysis. Osteoporos Int 20: 133-40.

Clinical and Experimental Research in Cardiology

Tables at a glance
table-icon
Table 1
table-icon
Table 2
Figures at a glance
image-icon
Figure 1
image-icon
Figure 2
image-icon
Figure 3
Figure 1: Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in different CAD groups
Figure 2: Mean serum vitamin D level in different CAD groups
Figure 3: Correlation between serum levels of vitamin D and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

 

Vitamin D Deficiency

Vitamin D sufficiency

P value

Age Mean ±SD

64 ±11

67 ±10

<0.001

Male, n (%)

1752 (63.6%)

738 (49.9%)

<0.001

HTN, n (%)

1429 (51.9%)

801 (54.2%)

0.155

DM, n (%)

765 (27.8%)

466 (31.5%)

0.011

Dyslipidemia, n (%)

537 (19.4%)

325 (21.9%)

0.432

Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients with vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D sufficiency

 

Vitamin D Deficiency

Vitamin D sufficiency

P value

Syntax, median (IQR)

19 (12-26)

17 (12-26)

0.212

Diseased vessels

 

 

0.106

Single vessel disease, n (%)

858 (40.1%)

456 (43.9%)

 

Two vessel disease, n (%)

527 (24.6%)

232 (22.3%)

 

Three vessel disease, n (%)

757 (35.3%)

351 (33.8%)

 

Table 2: Comparison the number of diseased vessels and syntax score of both groups

Partnered Content Networks

  • Cancer Science
  • Vaccine Studies
  • Gynecology
  • Food Nutrition
  • Nursing Science
  • Public Health
  • The Pharma
  • Infectious Disease
  • Neuro Care
  • Catalysis
  • Neonatal Biology
  • Neonatal Disorders
  • Mutation
  • Nanotechnology
  • Toxicology
  • Dark Biotechnology
  • Pollution Toxicology
  • Cell Biology
  • Bioanalytical Research
  • Renal Disorders
  • The Astrophysics
  • Sleep Physiology
  • Epidemiology
  • Histology